Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Anjani Nandan Sharan, JJ
Brij Kishore Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through General Manager, North Central Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case regarding applicant's removal and prior proceedings. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding jurisdictional challenges and procedural integrity. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the necessity of exhausting remedies. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final conclusion on dismissal and rights to appeal. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
ORDER
Delivered by: Justice Rajiv Josh, Member (J)
Heard Shri Pradeep , Shri Rajesh , learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Anil , learned counsel for the respondents and with the consent of learned counsel for both the parties, the instant Original Application is being disposed of at the admission stage itself.
2. The instant Original Application, under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act , 1985, has been filed by the applicant seeking following reliefs:
“a. Issue an order or direction in the appropriate nature to quash and set aside the impugned the impugned charge sheet dated 23.7.2019, inquiry report dated 21.3.2020 and punishment order dated 23.7.2020 (Annexure No. A-1) and impugned removal from service order dated 14.6.2024 (Annexure No. A-2).
b. Issue an order or direction in the appropriate nature commanding to the Respondents
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
