Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Shri Krishna, A, Shri Umesh Gajankush, J
Mr. Govind S/o Bhagwanji Deotale – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of applicant's claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding previous decisions. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations on necessary actions. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. directives for representations and response. (Para 10) |
| 5. conclusion of the judgement. (Para 11) |
ORDER
Per: Mr. Shri Krishna, Member (A)
The issue involved in both the above OAs are similar. Therefore, with the consent of both the parties, both the OAs have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.
2 . The applicants in both the OAs are challenging the impugned communication dated 09/13th May, 2013 issued by Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India vide File No.C—30014/29/2013-V&L by which the outsourcing of services of direct deployment of casual workers have been prohibited.
3. The applicants in OA No.2214/2017 have submitted that they were appointed as causal labourers in Group ‘D’ category w.e.f. different dates of their appointment with the respondents Nos.6, 7, 8 & 9 in different capacities like Peon, Safai Karmachari, Night Watchman, Bell Duty, Cleaning and Sweeping, Form Stores after conducting the interview of each
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
