Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SH. RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, J, MRS. ANJALI BHAWRA, A
Mrs. Sadbhavna Pandit – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. inaction challenging orders and promotion prospects. (Para 1 , 2 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. applicant’s service record and lack of promotion. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 10) |
| 3. judicial mandates emphasize urgency for administrative compliance. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
ORDER
Per: SH. RAMESH SINGH THAKUR MEMBER (J):
1. The present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 against the he instant Original Application is directed against the inaction of the respondents in :-
(i) Not complying with the Orders of this Hon'ble Tribunal dated 01.12.2015 till date.
(ii) not creating a promotional avenue for the Applicant despite the Hon'ble Supreme Court having held (and this honble Tribunal having directed) that every employee is required to be granted a minimum of two promotions during his/her service career.
(iii) The action of the Respondents in calling for a panel from the States of Punjab/Haryana to fill up the next higher post to which the Applicant has a legitimate and genuine claim as detailed in the present O.A. hereunder.
(iv) Appointing the respondent No. 6 as Joint Principal Medical Officer cum Medical Superintendent (A-13) on deputation bas
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
