Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J), Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
Dr. Gautam Talukdar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case and the applicant's situation regarding retirement and charge-sheet. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the legitimacy of the charge-sheet service prior to retirement. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis on service attempts and legal distinctions from precedents. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's rationale on effective communication under applicable rules. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final verdict confirming dismissal of the application. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
The present Original Application (O.A.) has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking the following relief(s):
(i) Allow this Original Application.
(ii) Set aside/quash the impugned Office Order PAO/ SJE/ADMN/2023-24/1389-1391 dated 12.03.2024 < (Annexure-A1) impugned Office Order No. PAO/ SJE/ADMN/2023-24/1427-1429 dated 14.03.2024 (Annexure-A1) issued by respondent no.4, being illegal, unconstitutional, violative of relevant provisions & non-est in the eyes of law.
(iii) Pass an order directing respondent to issue regular pension to the applicant from the date following the date of his retirement with all admissi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
