Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. K. Haripal, J, Mrs. V. Rama Mathew, ACJ
K. Sivasankaran – Appellant
Versus
Union of India represented by General Manager, Southern Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. directed re-calculation of qualifying service and re-confirmation. (Para 1 , 16 , 17) |
| 2. recognition of prior service for pension. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. disputed claims regarding service recognition. (Para 5 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. clarification on legal standing of services for pension. (Para 6 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 18) |
| 5. final conclusion affirming 50% service for pension eligibility. (Para 14) |
ORDER
Justice K.Haripal, Judicial Member
Since common questions were raised, all these Original Applications were clubbed, heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. O.A.472/2022 is taken as the lead case. Reference will be made about the documents produced in that case.
2. All the applicants were initially engaged in the Southern Railway as Commission Bearers by making security deposit of Rs.250/-. Thereafter, it is submitted, on the basis of the order of this Tribunal in O.A.368/1992 they were made to work as Salaried Commission Bearers. Then all of them were regularised in the Railway absorbing them in the Electrical Branch; later they have retired from service on attaining age of superannuation.
3. The common grievance of the applicants is that though they commenced their
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
