Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, A
Sh. Vinod Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay in filing applications must be substantiated by sufficient cause. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. oral assurances do not adequately justify delays in legal proceedings. (Para 3 , 4 , 12) |
| 3. limitation periods must be respected to uphold the integrity of the administrative process. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 24) |
| 4. applications barred by limitation may be dismissed without evaluating merits. (Para 30) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A): -
By way of the present M.A., the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: -
“a) Allow the present application and may kindly condone the delay of approximately 7 years in filing the O.A. i.e. 2555 days.
b) Pass such or other further order that this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the above mentioned O.A. has been filed before this Tribunal by the applicant and is fixed for 17.12.2024. He further states that on perusal of the contents of the O.A., its ground and the documents are annexed therewith, it is evident that the applicant has a plausible case in his favour. The O.A. is likely to be succeeded. He contends that the applicant p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
