Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
B.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J, MR. SANTOSH MEHRA, A
Smt. Latha K N@ Latha @ C Latha – Appellant
Versus
THE UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application filed for condonation of delay. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. respondent's objection on delay and eligibility. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. explanation of section 21 limitations. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's position on repeated representations. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. delay and laches are crucial in law. (Para 16 , 21) |
| 6. final dismissal due to lack of sufficient reason for delay. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
ORDER
PER: JUSTICE B.K. SHRIVASTAVA, MEMBER (J)
1. This order shall govern the disposal of M.A No.696 of 2024 filed for condonation of delay in filing the Original Application No.684 of 2024 which was filed before this Tribunal on 04.12.2024
2. It is stated by the applicant in the aforesaid M.A., that respondent No.2 issued the Office Order dated 01.07.2023 and in reference to the aforesaid order, the applicant submitted an application for compassionate appointment for her Daughter on the same day on 01.07.2023, but no decision has been taken in this regard. The applicant visited the Advocate’s office on 12.10.2024. Therefore, if there is some delay, that should be condoned.
3. On the other hand, the respondents opposed the aforesaid application. The respondents have also filed an object
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
