SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 12422

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MR. RAJINDER SINGH DOGRA, J, MR. RAM MOHAN JOHRI, A
Krishan Lal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
Transfer Application No. 1387/2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Dalvinder
For the Respondents: Mr. Hunar Gupta, DAG

Out-of-turn promotions are discretionary rewards, not entitlements; entitlement depends on the merit and substantive evaluation of performance.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India, Articles 14 and 16 - Promotion - The petitioner, a constable, challenges the rejection of his claim for out-of-turn promotion relative to his colleagues, asserting violations of fairness and natural justice leading to discrimination.

(B) The Court observed that out-of-turn promotions are discretionary and must follow established norms; hence, the right to such an award is not automatic based solely on participation in operations.

(C) The Court concluded that the decision of the DGP to grant promotions based on criteria of exceptional merit was not arbitrary or perverse and complied with earlier directives from the Court.

(D) The principles of equality and fairness under Articles 14 and 16 were not upheld due to sufficient differentiation in the merit and performance of the personnel involved. (E)

Result: The petition is dismissed due to the lack of merit in the claims lodged by the petitioner and adherence to established protocols.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claims for promotions based on prior performance in anti-militancy operations. (Para 3)
2. respondents emphasize merit-based promotions guided by regulations. (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
3. court's examination of whether decisions were arbitrary or discriminatory. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. final dismissal of petition based on absence of merit in claims. (Para 17 , 18)

ORDER

Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member

1. The SWP/WP(C) No. 1222/2006 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A. No. 61/1387/2020 by the Registry of this Tribunal.

2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court with following prayer:

a) “to quash Order No:348 of 2006 dated 30.01.2006 issued try the Director General of Police, J&K, by which the Director General of Polite has rejected the case of the petitioner for out of turn promotion and also to quash Order No.4245 of 2000 dated 29.12.2000 by which proforma respondents No.9 to 14 have been given out of turn promotion,

b) to issue direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for out of turn promotion to the post of Selection Grade Constable, in light of the recommendation made by the Chief Prosecuting Officer vide recommendation dated 9.11.2002 and the recommendation made by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kathua vide recommendation No.PA/12088-99 dated 27.12.2002. by issuance of writ of mandamus; and

c) to issue direction to the respondents to give the similar treatment to the petitioner as the respondents have given to the similarly situated proforma respondents No.9 to 14 namely, Constable Sanjay Kumar No.752/K, Const.Mohd. Iqbal No.885/K, Const. Pawan Kumar No.951/K. Const. Naseeb Singh No.855/K. Const. Joginder Singh No.882/K, Const Bhopinder Singh No.919/K vide Order No.4245 of 2000 dated 29.12.2000, by giving them promotion, by issuance of writ of mandamus; and

d) to issue direction to the respondents to give the effect of promotion to the petitioner retrospectively to the next higher post of Selection Grade Constable w.e.f. the date the respondents have given promotion to the proforma respondents No.9 to14, namely Constable Sanjay Kumar No.752/K, Const. Mohd. Iqbal No.885/K, Const. Pawan Kumar No.951/K, Const. Naseeb Singh No.855/K, Const. Joginder Singh No.882/K, Const. Bhopinder Singh No.919/K vide Order No.4245 of 2000 dated 29.12.2000 and also to give all the promotional benefits and other consequential benefits to the petitioner arising out of promotion to the post of Selection Grade Constable, by issuance of writ of mandamus, and

e) to issue direction to the respondents restraining them to make any promotion to the post of Selection Grade Constable and restraining the respondents to adjust or appoint or promote any person to the post of Selection Grade Constable and restraining the respondents to fill up the vacant post of Head Constable, by issuance of writ of mandamus; and f) to declare the Order No.348 of 2006 dated 30.01.2006 and Order No.4245 of 2000 dated 29.12.2000, as ultra-vires, illegal and contrary to the provisions of principles of natural justice, by issuance of writ of mandamus;

3. The facts of the case as averred by the petitioner in his pleadings are as follows:

a) The petitioner, a permanent resident of the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir, is a law-abiding and respectable citizen of India. He was appointed as a Constable on 19.04.1992 in the Jammu and Kashmir Police and successfully completed his basic training from Police Training College, Udhampur. Thereafter, he was posted in District Kathua, where he served with dedication, sincerity, and courage, earning commendations from his superiors for his discipline, honesty, and devotion to duty.

b) While posted at Police Post Ramkot, District Kathua, the petitioner participated in multiple anti-militancy operations during the year 2000. On 09.08.2000, under the supervision of SDPO Basohli, a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top