Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajinder Singh Dogra, J, Ram Mohan Johri, A
Mohd Ashan Itoo – Appellant
Versus
State of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's experienced promotion claim under rba. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. promotion equality and administrative errors impact. (Para 4 , 10 , 12) |
| 3. senior employee rights under service laws. (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. administrative actions must align with equality principles. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER
Per: - Rajinder Singh Dogra, Judicial Member
1. The SWP/WP(C) No. 185/2012 was transferred from the Hon’ble High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu and was registered as T.A. No. 61/6366/2021 by the Registry of this Tribunal.
2. The present matter was filed before the Hon’ble High Court with following prayer:
a) “writ of certioran and quo warranto quashing office order No DSHJ/Estt/NG/13884-89 dated 7-1-2012 issued by respondent No.2 in so far as and to the extent, respondent No.3 has been promoted under RBA category to the post of Head Assistant in the Sheep Husbandry department and adjusted as such in the office of District Sheep Husbandry Officer Kishtwar, as being unconstitutional, contrary to the recruitment rules and SRO 272, illegal and discriminatory.
With
A further writ of mandamus commanding the respondents 1 and 2 to promote the petitioner as Head Assistant in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
