Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial), Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (Administrative)
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges regarding deferment of promotions. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments sustaining administrative actions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's justification for differential seniority adjustments. (Para 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. clarification on legality and non-reductive nature of deferment. (Para 12) |
| 5. final dismissal of the original application. (Para 13) |
ORDER
Delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial) Heard S.K. Singh Vashisth, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri Vidyapati Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Instant Original Application has been filed by the applicant on 11.04.2016 under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following main relief(s):-
“i. to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order No.32 dated 11.01.2016 (Annexure A-1) and other connected orders harming the applicants.
ii. to issue a write, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing respondents to maintain the same date of promotion (i.e. 22.06.2011 particularly 31.05.2010 instead of 22.12.2015) as ordered vide O.F. Board Kolkata letter No. DJWM- 15/SUPPL/2010/A/GB dated 22.06.2011 (Annexur
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
