Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, ACJ, Smt. Urmita Datta (Sen), J
Patit Paban Mali – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts concerning the applicant's status and previous orders. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments addressing the applicant's circumstances and validity of suspension. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's observations on representation consideration timelines. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
Per: Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das (A):
1. Ld Counsel for both the parties are present.
2. Heard.
3. The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , praying for the following relief(s):-
“a) To declare that the Order No. BDN/XT/2018-2019/Cable theft/17 dated 02/07/2018 for deemed suspension/ direction not to join duty with effect from 03.04.2018 until further order on account jail custody exceeding 48 hours passed by the BSNL authority has no validity after expiry of 90 days from the date of suspension from 03.04.2018 as per relevant provision of BSNL CDA Rules, 2006 and/or CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965;
b) To declare that after issuance of the Order No. BDN/XT/2018- 2019/Cable theft/17 dated 02/07/2018 for deemed suspension/direction not to join duty with effect from 03.04.2018 until further order not to be in force continuously for never ending a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
