Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
RANJANA SHAHI, Judicial Member, LOK RANJAN, Administrative Member
HEERA CHAND MEENA – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. no vacancy in specific nursing superintendent posts despite cadre excess. (Para 2 , 3 , 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. reservations exempt transfers; parity claim rejected. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 18) |
| 3. vacancy prerequisite for transfer; no estoppel against law. (Para 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. no absolute right to spouse posting without feasibility. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. oa dismissed for lack of vacancy. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Per : Hon’ble Shri Lok Ranjan, Member (A)
The present Original Application had been filed against the impugned letter dated 16.10.2024, whereby the Advocate’s Notice for Demand of Justice dated 23.09.2024 on behalf of the Applicant for inter-Division Transfer [referred also as I.R.T. hereafter, sinceit was covered by the same guidelines as that for inter-Railway Transfer] on spouse grounds, from Jabalpur Division to Kota Division, both under West Central Railway (W.C.R.), had been decided upon and not acceded to.
2. Based on the pleadings of the parties, the relevant matrix of facts had emerged to be as follows briefly. The Applicant was working as Senior Nursing Superintendent (Sr. N.S.) in New Katni Sub-Divisional Railway Hospital, when vide application dated 12.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
