SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 12833

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
N Ashokraj – Appellant
Versus
D/o Revenue – Respondent


CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI BENCH Dated this the 27th day of October, Two Thousand Twenty Five CORAM :

HON'BLE MR M. SWAMINATHAN. MEMBER (J)

AND HON'BLE MR. SISIR KUMAR RATHO, MEMBER(A)

N.Ashokraj, Superintendent of Central Excise, Audit-II Commissionerate, Central Excise Zone, Chennai. .. Applicant By Advocate M/s M. Ravi Vs.

1.The Joint Commissioner of Central Excise (Original Authority), O/o Joint Commissioner (P&V), Central Excise, Chennai-III, No.121, Mahathma Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

2. The Commissioner of Central Excise (Appellate Authority), O/o Commissioner Central Excise, Chennai-III, No.121, Mahathma Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai.

3.The Chief Commissioner of Central Excise (Revision Authority), O/o Chief Commissioner Central Excise, Chennai-III, No.26/1, Mahathma Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai. .. Respondents By Advocate Mr. Su. Srinivasan, SCGSC

ORDER

(Pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. M. Swaminathan, Judicial Member)

Challenging the of punishment of reduction of pay by two stages from Rs.9250/- to 8750/- for the period one year, imposed by the 1st respondent and which has been confirmed in appeal and revision, the applicant has filed the OA for quashi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top