Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, A
Satish – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Education (Through its Director) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for reinstatement after termination (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations of misconduct and absence from duty (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. analysis of competence and procedural issues in termination (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 33 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 4. distinction between punitive dismissal and non-punitive termination (Para 32 , 34) |
| 5. final order to quash termination and remand case back (Para 42 , 43 , 44) |
ORDER
By way of the present O.A., the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: -
(ii) The Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 17.10.2019 (ANNEXURE-A-2) passed by the respondent whereby, the applicant’s representation for reinstatement to the post of Assistant Teacher under the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi, has been rejected;
(iv) Any other relief, order or directions which this Hon’ble Tribunal considers just and fit may also be passed in the interest of justice.”
3. He further submits that during the course of the present proceedings, the respondents, in their counter affidavit as well as oral submissions, have contended th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
