Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
SURESH KUMAR BATRA, J, RASHMI SAXENA SAHNI, A
Charanjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
M/o Defence – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of applicants' claims for promotional benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. evidence of arbitrary administrative delays in promotion. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. findings related to equitable treatment and established precedents. (Para 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. final determination and direction regarding promotional rights. (Para 13 , 15) |
ORDER (ORAL)
PER: SURESH KUMAR BATRA, MEMBER (J)
The applicants in the above captioned 13 Original Applications are claiming similar relief on the same grounds and the facts are also similar in all these OAs, therefore, these have been taken up for hearing together and disposed of by this common order, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.
2. The applicants in these 13 Original Applications are claiming benefit of promotion and its consequential benefits from the date of commencement of vacancy year against which they have promoted and have sought quashing of orders whereby their seniority and financial benefits have been ordered to be effective from the date of assumption of charge of promoted post. For the sake of convenience and to avoid repetition of details, the facts are being taken from O.A. No. 193/2021 titled Charanjit Singh
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
