Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. R. N. Singh, J, Mr. Sanjeeva Kumar, A
Rohtas Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the cases were heard together due to common issues regarding employment terminations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. the applicants challenged their terminations, seeking reinstatement and citing a prior ruling. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. there were disputes about fairness and opportunity for justification for terminations. (Para 9) |
ORDER (ORAL)
By Hon’ble Mr. R. N. Singh, Member (J)
It is not in dispute that the issues involved in the captioned O.A. are identical. In this view of the matter, with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the captioned O.A.s have been heard together and are being disposed of vide the present common order.
2. For convenience in writing the order(s), the O.A./557/2025 is being treated as lead case and facts are being derived therefrom.
3. In the present O.A., the applicant has challenged the order dated 30.01.2018, vide which his appointment as Postal Assistant was ordered to be terminated with immediate effect.
4. The applicant has prayed for the following relief(s):-
“a) Quash and set aside impugned order: -
1. Memo No. B-21l0/Recruitment/2013-2014 dated 30.01.2018 issued by Office of Sr. Superintendent of Post Offices, Sangrur Division to the ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
