Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
HON’BLE DR. LATA BASWARAJ PATNE, J, HON’BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ACJ
K.Sathi Raju – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application challenges dismissal order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. details of alleged misconduct provided. (Para 5) |
| 3. arguments against evidence and process. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. tribunal’s observations on procedural validity. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. scope of appeal and punishment validity reinforced. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. principle of misappropriation's penal severity upheld. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. final dismissal of the application. (Para 16) |
ORDER
PER: HON’BLE MR. VARUN SINDHU KUL KAUMUDI, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
1. The present Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , seeking therein the following relief:
“...to quash and set aside the impugned Memo No.ST/14-107/3/2015 dated 04.04.2017 issued by the 2nd Respondent upholding the appellate order vide Memo No.ST/13-24/107/2014 dated 24.12.2014 issued by the 3rd Respondent whereby the punishment of dismissal of applicant imposed by the 4th Respondent vide his Memo No.F4- 4/2005-2006 dated 30.10.2014 was given a stamp of approval being the same illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the principles of natural justice and consequently Respondents to reinstate the services
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
