CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, A
KUSUM LATA – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pending representations should be timely processed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court mandates decisions on representations. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. final order emphasizes procedural compliance. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER (ORAL)
By Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J)
The Registry has raised certain objections in the matter on the ground of non-disposal of the pending representation. The Registry is, however, directed to assign a regular number to the Original Application.
M.A. No. 4822/2025 (Joining Together)
The present M.A. has been filed seeking permission for the applicants to pursue the O.A. jointly.
2. For the reasons stated therein, the M.A. is allowed, and the applicants are permitted to pursue the O.A. jointly.
M.A. No. 4823/2025 (Exemption) is allowed subject to just exceptions.
O.A. No. 4302/2025
The present Original Application has been filed seeking the following relief(s):–
“8.1. Direct the Respondents to place relevant record pertaining to the Applicants in the present Original Application;
8.2. Direct the Respondents to consider and regularize the services of the Applicants, from the date of joining of the Applicants by devising a suitable methodology as per the relevant rules in acc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.