Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
K.HARIPAL, J, V.RAMA MATHEW, ACJ
Dr.P.Suresh Babu IAS – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. eligibility for ias promotion hinges on recognizing training periods. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. delay in promotions leads to rights violations under constitutional provisions. (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. respondents must adhere to prior court orders regarding pay and promotion. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. notional pay fixation and restoration of benefits are mandated. (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER
HON'BLE Mrs.V.RAMA MATHEW, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
We have heard both sides in extenso. The applicant has filed this O.A aggrieved by the refusal on the part of the respondents to restore his benefits arising out of the delay in promoting him to the said service.
Briefly speaking the facts are as under - The applicant joined the post of Deputy Collector on 29.10.2005 based on an appointment order dated 09.08.2005 after having secured the 1st rank in the PSC examination conducted for appointment to the post of Deputy Collector by direct recruitment. Earlier he was working as a Scientist with the Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre under the Department of Space, Government of India. It is submitted that on being appointed as Deputy Collector, the District Collector, Thiruvananthapuram admitted him to duty and posted for in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
