Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, J, ANJALI BHAWRA, A
Roop Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the case involves contesting the removal of ews reservation in updated vacancy notifications. (Para 1 , 5 , 10 , 22) |
| 2. the applicant argues the process violates the existing reservation policies. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 19) |
| 3. respondents justify vacancy allocation changes citing legal compliance with reservation laws. (Para 13 , 15 , 17 , 20) |
| 4. court determines the legality of revisions to vacancy notifications and enforces compliance with existing reservation ceilings. (Para 24 , 26) |
ORDER
Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):
1. The present Original Application has been p referred a gainst Memorandum No. R&E/77-17/2020 dated 19.05.2021 ( Annexure A -1) t o the extent it relates to Hamirpur Postal Division w hereby o ne v acancy reserved for EWS Category has been excluded and g iven t o u nreserved category ignoring the claim of the applicant who b elongs t o E WS Category, and further against Memorandum d ated 2 4.05.2021 (Annexure A-3) issued by Respondent No.2 whereby t he r esult o f t he Postman/Mail Guard Examination 2020 has been declared t o t he e xtent it pertain Hamirpur Division whereby the vacancy r eserved f or E WS Category has been excluded and vide Ann
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
