SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13193

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, J, ANJALI BHAWRA, A
Roop Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
O.A./773/2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rishav Sharma
For the Respondents: Ms. Suchitra Thakur for R-1 & 2, Mr. Karam Pal for R-3

The alteration of vacancy notifications does not confer vested rights if done lawfully within established reservation guidelines.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16 - Reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) - The applicant challenged the exclusion of EWS category from a vacancy reserved for the LDCE for Postman positions with claims based on the DoPT guidelines concerning reservation policy. (Paras 1-20)

(B) Recruitment Rules - The Tribunal ruled that the notification of vacancies was tentative and could be revised, reaffirming the legality of reallocating an EWS post to the unreserved category to adhere to the 50% ceiling limit on reservations established by law. (Paras 22-27)

Facts of the case:
The applicant, qualified under the EWS category, challenged the alteration of a previously notified vacancy reserved for EWS status to an unreserved status leading to his exclusion despite qualifying for the examination.

Findings of Court:
The original notification allowed amendments prior to the declaration of selection results, maintaining compliance with reservation laws.

Issues: The Tribunal addressed whether deleting the EWS vacancy and reallocating it to unreserved status was lawful or arbitrary.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal found the action of revising vacancy notifications before results could not be considered retrospective and recognized the legal limits on reservation percentages.

Result: The application was dismissed.

Table of Content
1. the case involves contesting the removal of ews reservation in updated vacancy notifications. (Para 1 , 5 , 10 , 22)
2. the applicant argues the process violates the existing reservation policies. (Para 9 , 11 , 12 , 19)
3. respondents justify vacancy allocation changes citing legal compliance with reservation laws. (Para 13 , 15 , 17 , 20)
4. court determines the legality of revisions to vacancy notifications and enforces compliance with existing reservation ceilings. (Para 24 , 26)

ORDER

Per: RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):

1. The present Original Application has been p referred a gainst Memorandum No. R&E/77-17/2020 dated 19.05.2021 ( Annexure A -1) t o the extent it relates to Hamirpur Postal Division w hereby o ne v acancy reserved for EWS Category has been excluded and g iven t o u nreserved category ignoring the claim of the applicant who b elongs t o E WS Category, and further against Memorandum d ated 2 4.05.2021 (Annexure A-3) issued by Respondent No.2 whereby t he r esult o f t he Postman/Mail Guard Examination 2020 has been declared t o t he e xtent it pertain Hamirpur Division whereby the vacancy r eserved f or E WS Category has been excluded and vide Annexure A-1 t he v acancies h ave been increased from 2 to 3 and no reservation has b een p rovided t o EWS Category. The applicant has prayed for reliefs as under:

“i) That the complete record of the case be called for;

ii) That Annexure A-1 dated 19.05.2021 changing t he v acancy p osition in Hamirpur Division from two to three and t hereafter m aking o f appointment for four posts vide Annexure A-3 to t he e xtent i t r elates to Hamirpur Division be quashed and set aside.

iii) It be declared that the applicant is entitled to a ppointment t o t he post of Postman as per merit and notification under E WS q uota w ith a s per all result 80 declared dated 31.01.2019 consequential b enefits from the date it has been made to the other s imilarly p laced employees.

iv) That this Hon'ble Tribunal may also pass any o ther o rder f or t he grant of relief to the applicant which it may deem f it i n t he p eculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

v) That the cost of the application may also be a warded i n f avour o f the applicant.”

2. Facts of the case in brief are as follows. The a pplicant, p resently working as Assistant Branch Postmaster (earlier k nown a s E xtra Departmental Delivery Agent/Mail Deliverer), j oined s ervice o n 01.08.1998 in Hamirpur Postal Division under the H .P. P ostal C ircle. T he applicant possesses the qualification of 10+2 a nd b elongs t o t he Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category, d uly c ertified v ide certificate dated 11.12.2020 (Annexure A-4).

3. The applicant has submitted that as per the R ecruitment R ules o f 2019 governing the cadre of Postman/Mail Guard, 5 0% o f t he p osts a re to be filled through a Limited Departmental Competitive E xamination (LDCE) from amongst eligible Gramin Dak S evaks ( GDS). T he respondents issued Notification dated 28.11.2020 ( Annexure A -2), notifying vacancies f or the vacancy year 2020. I n H amirpur D ivision, two posts were notified, one reserved for ST category a nd o ne f or E WS category.

4. The applicant applied through proper channel u nder t he E WS quota a nd appeared in the LDCE held on 20.12.2020. T he a pplicant qualified t he written examination with 86 marks a nd w as d eclared successful for the Data Entry and Skill Test (DEST) s cheduled f or 26.03.2021, as per Memorandum dated 19.03.2021 ( Annexure A -5). The a pplicant further qualified the DEST, securing 3 2 m arks, a s p er t he consolidated result (Annexure A-6).

5. The r espondents issued Memorandum d ated 1 9.05.2021 (Annexure A-1), whereby the vacancy earlier reserved f or E WS c ategory was deleted and shown as unreserved, while another v acancy w as earmarked for SC category. Consequently, the revised v acancy p osition reflected one unreserved post, one for ST, and one for SC category.

6. Subsequently, vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top