CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Ranjit More, Chairman, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Dr. Raj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Manoj Govil – Respondent
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):
By way of the present Contempt Petition, the petitioner has alleged non-compliance of the Order/Judgment dated 20.03.2024 passed by this Tribunal in OA No.2357/2023 (Annexure P-1). The operative portion of the said judgment reads as under:
"6.7 In the conspectus of the facts and circumstances brought out above, we are of the considered opinion that the respondent has erred in issuing the impugned Charge Memo to the applicant for the act exercised by him as a quasi-judicial officer, without subjecting him to judicial supervision in appeal. We are also of the view that the applicant has exercised due diligence. Coupled with these facts, when there is no financial implication, we allow the present OA with the following directions:-
i) Charge Memo No.C-14011/2/2023-Vigilance-MCA dated 13.06.2023 (Annexure A-1) is quashed and set aside;
ii) The respondent is directed to grant the applicant all consequential benefits flowing from setting aside of the Charge Memo; and
iii) The exercise, as ordained above, shall be completed by the respondents within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order."
2. Learned couns
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.