Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. K. Haripal, J, Mrs. V. Rama Mathew, ACJ
C. M. Mathew – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's marital status and pension entitlements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. legal obligations toward the daughter and first wife's pension claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. respondents' legal basis for requesting documentation from the applicant. (Para 6 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. judicial observations regarding the right to family pension. (Para 8 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 18) |
| 5. final decision to include second wife in pension records. (Para 19) |
ORDER
Justice K.Haripal, Judicial Member
Applicant is a former Stores Superintendent in the office of the 2nd respondent, who retired from service by availing voluntary retirement on 30.06.2005. He had married one Aleyamma on 17.01.1993. In that relationship one girl child, Merlin was born on 07.10.1994. But, later, differences of opinion developed in the marital relationship and the applicant moved the Family Court, Kottayam at Ettumanoor with O.P.No.88/1999 seeking divorce on the grounds of cruelty and desertion. By Annexure-A3 order dated 07.05.2005, divorce was granted and the request for restoration of conjugal rights claimed by the wife was rejected. Thus, that relationship severed through Court proceedings. It has been pointed out that when the said Aley
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
