Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, M (J), Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, M (A)
Pavan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through The General Manager, Northern Railway – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicants completed training and awaited posting following the selection process. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments raised focus on violations of natural justice and the arbitrary nature of cancellation. (Para 3) |
| 3. the court emphasized the need for documented procedures in cancellation decisions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. the cancellation orders lacked justifications and were deemed unlawful. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. conclusion orders enforced reinstatement of applicants as junior engineers. (Para 15 , 16) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):
By way of instant OA filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , the applicant is seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an order of quashing the impugned order dated 30.04.2025 and order dated 6.5.2025, declaring to the effect that the same are illegal and arbitrary and consequently, pass an order directing the respondents to restore the panel and post the applicants as JE as they have already completed their training of 12 months with all the consequential benefits.
(ii) That the Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to pass an ord
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
