Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J), Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A)
Manjeet – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Education – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. previous conviction affects suitability for employment. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments emphasize rights under the probation of offenders act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. assessment of candidate’s integrity is a legitimate administrative function. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. moral character and integrity are crucial in teaching positions. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 5. conclusion on dismissal based on suitability assessment. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A): -
By way of the present O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: -
“(i) Set aside the impugned Order dated 16.11.2023, issued by the respondent No. 2/Deputy Director of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi, whereby the candidature of the applicant (Roll No. 112503900346) for appointment on the post of TGT (Social Science) (Male)(Post Code: 39/21) in Directorate of Education, Govt. of NCT of Delhi was rejected;
(ii) Direct the respondents to issue an appointment letter to the applicant thereby appointing him on the post of TGT (Social Science)(Male) (Post Code: 39/21) in Directorate of Education and grant him all the consequential benefits (mon
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
