Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mrs. Urmita Datta Sen, J, Mr. Anindo Majumdar, ACJ
Prokash Chandra Bose – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Communication & I.T., Department of Post – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the applicant's initial role and case history. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments laid out by both parties regarding promotions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis of promotion validity and correct payroll procedures. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. ratios established regarding pay corrections and fulfillment of prior tribunal orders. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling issued by the tribunal. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
ORDER
Urmita Dutta (Sen), Judicial Member:
The applicant has filed this O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-
“a) An order quashing and/or setting aside the letters dated 19/26.4.2013, 2.7.2013 and 30/31.7.2013;
b) An order holding that the decision regarding reduction of the pay of the applicant and consequent reduction of pay of the applicant from Rs.8125/- to Rs.7425/- are bad in law and consequently the Memo dated 27.7.2006 and the Memo dated 6.10.2006 are not tenable in law;
c) An order directing the respondents to restore the pay of the applicant to Rs.8125/- which was reduced subsequently and to give all consequential benefits of pay fixation as well as differential pay and allowances with effect from the date
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
