Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta, Anindo Majumdar, JJ
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Sanjoy Sen – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review applications must adhere to correcting self-evident errors while upholding procedural justice. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the delay in disciplinary proceedings must be justified and addressed promptly to ensure fairness. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. clarification on the scope of review under the act and the applicability of natural justice principles. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. grounds for requesting extensions must be compelling to prevent misuse of time and procedural rules. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. final decisions should reinforce adherence to timelines set by the tribunal for disciplinary proceedings. (Para 11) |
ORDER
[In Circulation]
Per Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member:-
The instant Review Application has been filed by the Applicants /Original Respondents praying to review / withdraw/ Recall/ modify/set aside the Judgement/Order dated 27.08.2024 passed in M.A. No. 756/2024 and O.A. 157/2024 wherein after hearing the Ld. Counsel for both sides and perusing the material available on record this Tribunal has observed as under:
“Heard learned counsel for both sides.
The present MA. 756/2024 has been filed by the original respondents praying for further extension of 06 months' time to comply with the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
