Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sudhi Ranjan Mishra, J, Pramod Kumar Das, A
Pankaja Kumar Lenka – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicant challenged the legality of his premature retirement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. detailing of the applicant's performance and the integrity assessment leading to retirement. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. rebuttal to the dopt guidelines on retirement due to performance. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
ORDER
SUDHI RANJAN MISHRA, MEMBER (J):
The Applicant was working as Accounts Officer/Enforcement Officer in the office of Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office, Rourkela and, while working as such, the Competent Authority, in exercise of power conferred under provisos of Rule 56 (J)(i) of the Fundamental Rules (FR) read with Rule 48 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 ordered to retire him from service prematurely, vide order No. AVS-2001418-HRM-IX/E/8735 dated 02.12.2024 (A/3). Being aggrieved by the aforesaid order, he preferred memorial/representation dated 06.12.2024 which was considered and rejected and the rejection was communicated to him vide letter No. AVS-20014/3/2018-HRM-IX/E/809 dated 03.02.2025 (A/8) which orders have been challenged by the Applicant in this Original Application filed u/s.19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
