CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Anand S. Khati, A
Randhir Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges orders of vigilance clearance denial. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding authority and procedural failures. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. result regarding interim relief and eventual decision on clearance. (Para 6) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J):
In the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 , the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
“8.1. to allow the present application;
8.2. to quash and set aside the impugned Letter dated 14.05.2024 ofRespondent No. 2 [Annexure: A-1];
8.3. to quash and set aside the impugned Letter dated 12.02.2024 ofRespondent No. 2 [Annexure: A-2];
8.4. to grant all consequential benefits of the above quashing to the Applicant as permissible in law;
8.5. to direct the Respondents not to block/stop the Vigilance Clearance of the Applicant only because of the Criminal Case in question pending before the Court of Additional ChiefJudicial Magistrate-VI, Patna City;
8.6. to direct the Respondent to pay suitable compensation to the Applicant as this Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case;
8.7. to issue any such and further order/di




Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.