Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Anand S. Khati, A
Ajit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Jal Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pursuit of financial benefits under acp and macp schemes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of promotions and eligibility criteria observed. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. court reflects on the importance of meaningful financial upgradation. (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final reasoning behind granting financial benefits despite promotions. (Para 10) |
| 5. conclusion on compliance with revised pay directives. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Dr. Anand S. Khati, Member (A)
In the present Original Application, filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, the applicant has sought for the following relief(s):
“(i) direct the respondent to provide financial benefits to the applicant under the 2nd ACP from 2004 in the pay scale of PB-1 Rs. 4000-6000 (GP 2800) and thereafter for 3rd MACP w.e.f. year 2010 in GP 4200; and/or
(ii) award interest @ 18% to the Applicant against the Respondent on the delayed payment of financial benefits to the applicant under the 2nd ACP from 2004 in the pay scale of PB-1 Rs. 4000-6000 (GP 2800) and thereafter for 3rd MACP w.e.f. year 2010 in GP 4200 from the date he became eligible till the date of payment;
(iii) direct the respondent to pay retiral dues on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
