CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. Manish Garg, J, Dr. Anand S. Khati, A
Ayai Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application seeks relief concerning caregiver grounds. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. protection of caregivers is essential under disability rights. (Para 9) |
| 3. tribunal allowed the application, quashed the transfer order. (Para 10) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Manish Garg, Member (J) :
In the present Original Application, the applicant has prayed for the following reliefs:
“i. Quash and set aside the policy decision dated 22.09.2022 only, to the extent that it does not include the policy decision dated 08.10.2018 issued by the DoPT, which exempts the primary care givers from routine transfer.
ii. Quash and set aside the order dated 14.06.2023 to the limited extent qua the applicant, who is at Sl. No. 16 of the said order;
iii. Award the cost in favour of the applicant and against the respondents;
iv. Pass such other further order(s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. Leraned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is aggrieved by his transfer from Delhi to Jaipur, ordered on 14.06.2023. Simultaneously, the applicant has also placed a challenge to the policy decision dated 22.09.2022 on the ground that it is contrary to an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.