CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MR. AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JM, MRS. MALLIKA ARYA, AM
Dr. Jeevan Mehrotra, Dr. Jeetendra Kumar, Dr. Anurag Khanna, Dr. Arvind Rai, Dr. Mohd. Kaleem Siddiqui, Mohd. Faheem Siddiqui, Smt. Rajiya Shaheen – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Secretary of Health and Family Welfare, Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Director General (L.W.) Ministry of Labour and Employment, Department of Personnel and Training, Welfare Commissioner Labour Welfare Organization – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts related to applicants' ad-hoc appointment timeline. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments for regularization based on continuous service. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. observation on past precedents and their implications. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's decision emphasizes equal treatment under the law. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling instructing the regularization from initial appointment. (Para 15) |
ORDER
This Original Application has been filed by the applicants under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 for the following relief(s):-
“8.1. Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the orders dated 13.09.2017 and 20.04.2018 passed by the respondent No. 5 & respondent No.3.
8 (A-1)This Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash the order dated 4.2.2016 (Annexure No. A-4 of the original application in regard to the applicant and further fixed the respondents to issue as fresh order for regularization of services of applicants from their initial date of appointment i.e. 01.07.1995, 17.06.1995, 7.10.1995, 31.05.1995 and 07.01.1994 with all consequential benefits.
8 (B) Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased direct to the respondents give all service benefits to the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.