ORDER

Hon’ble Mr.Pramod Kumar Das, A.M.

The applicant challenging the illegal and incorrect interpretation of bunching benefit already given but decided to be taken back has filed this OA praying for following reliefs:

a) Quash the rough memo No. 77 dated 17.03.2020 issued by IAP under Annexure A/9 and Postmaster, Rayagada HO Letter No. RGDA/AC/IAP/SB-PS Nayak/2020 dated 17.03.2020 under Annexure A/10.

b) And pass appropriate orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case with costs.

2. The brief facts of the case as inter alia averred by the applicant in the OA is that he had joined in the department of posts as Postal Assistant on 20.07.1997 and promoted to the post of Inspector of Post Offices from 03.09.2005. It is submitted that on implementation of 6th CPC his pay was placed in new pay structure i.e. scale of 9300-34800 in PB 2 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/- and his pay was revised and fixed as Rs. 14430/-. It is submitted that in the year 2017 in compliance to order of CAT, Ernakulam Bench order dated 16.10.2015 in OA No. 289/2013 an order was issued by Ministry of Communications, Depart3m ent of Posts vide letter dated 24.10.2017 for upgradation