CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MR. RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, J, MRS. ANJALI BHAWRA, A
Rajinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Revenue Secretary to Government of India, Ministry of Finance – Respondent
ORDER
Per: HON’BLE MR. RAMESH SINGH THAKUR, MEMBER (J):
1. All the above Execution Applications are being taken up together as the facts and order to be executed is similar in all these cases. All these Execution Applications have been filed praying that the order dated 10.04.2024 based on order dated 28.11.2020 upheld by the Hon’ble High Court in CWP No. 420 of 2022 decided on 10.03.2022 in bunch of petitions and further upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP No. 17898 of 2022 decided on 02.02.2023 be got implemented in its letter and spirit.
2. We require giving a quick glance to the general facts here. For the sake of convenience, we are taking facts from Execution Application No. 754/2025.
3. The applicant was appointed to various posts under Respondent No. 2, maintained satisfactory service, qualified the departmental examination, and was confirmed as Inspector. A CBI case was later registered alleging that he had secured employment on the basis of a forged SSC nomination letter. Although the applicant replied to a show-cause notice, the department did not issue any charge-sheet under Rule 14 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 and terminated his services without holding a regular in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.