Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. R.N. Singh, J, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, A
Naresh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant requests for relief based on prior rulings. (Para 2 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. undisputed facts regarding applicant's selection and dismissal. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. court's order to quash dismissal and reinstate applicant. (Para 10 , 16) |
| 4. discussion on principles of natural justice and proper procedures. (Para 14 , 15) |
ORDER (ORAL)
Hon’ble Mr. R.N. Singh, Member (J)
Pleadings are stated to be complete.
2. By way of the present OA filed under Section 19 of the AT Act, 1985, the applicant has challenged the impugned order dated 18.09.2018 and has prayed for the following relief(s):–
“(a) declare that the impugned Charge Sheet dt. 18.9.2018
(ANNEXURE A-1); Order of Penalty dt. 22.12.2020
(ANNEXURE A-6) & order-in-Appeal dt. 27.5.2021
(ANNEXURE A-9) are bad in law
(b) quash & set aside the impugned Charge Sheet dt. 18.9.2018
(ANNEXURE A-1); Order of Penalty dt. 22.12.2020
(ANNEXURE A-6) & Order-in-Appeal dt. 27.5.2021
(ANNEXURE A-9)
(c) direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant in service with effect from the date the applicant has been dismissed from service with back wages & all consequential benefits
(d) allow the cost of this application to the applicant
(e) pass any o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
