Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial), Mr. Anjani Nandan Sharan, Member (Administrative)
Lal Jee Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Punit Kumar Mishra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of unauthorized absence and disciplinary charges against the applicant. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding procedural adherence and justification of disciplinary actions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations and framework governing judicial review in disciplinary proceedings. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. defined limits of interference by judicial authority in findings of fact in disciplinary cases. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. final decision of dismissal upheld, affirming procedural integrity. (Para 22) |
ORDER
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial):-
Heard Shri Satish Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Bablu Singh, learned counsel for the respondents at the time of hearing of the case.
2. The instant Original Application under Section 19 of the Central Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 has been filed for the following reliefs:
8 (i) That the order dated 17.03.2008 passed by the Divisional Commercial Manager, NCR, Allahabad (Annexure no. A-1) and order dated 21.04.2009, passed by Sr. Divisional Commercial Manager, NCR, Allahabad (Annexure no. A-2) be declared illegal and same be quashed and respondents be directed to reinstate
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
