Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
B.K. SHRIVASTAVA, J, SANTOSH MEHRA, A
Jagan Nath – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of applicants' requests for seniority. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. consequences of previous judgments on applicants' seniority. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arguments and claims by both parties regarding seniority. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. court's rationale on inter-se seniority principles. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
ORDER
Per: Hon’ble Shri Santosh Mehra ……Member(A)
Through this OA, the applicant has sought the following reliefs:
a) Call for records of the case from the respondents and on perusal
(b) Issue a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to implement the order dated 2.3.2018 in OA No.586-599/2015 in rem in respect of all the Inspectors who were recruited pursuant to Combined Graduate Level Examination 2006 and assign appropriate seniority in terms of the vacancy year and not from the date of appointment and fix the inter se seniority in terms of the rotation of quota principle;
(c) And grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit to grant to the applicants in the circumstances of the case including an order as to costs, in the interests of justice.
2. The facts in in a nutshell are as follow
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
