SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13657

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Goverdhan Singh Bhati – Appellant
Versus
M/o Defence – Respondent
O.A./398/2013



CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL JODHPUR BENCH, JODHPUR Original Application No. 290/00398/2013 Pronounced on : 21.11.2025 Reserved on : 16.10.2025 CORAM HON’BLE Mr JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE Dr AMIT SAHAI, MEMBER (A)

Shri Goverdhan Singh Bhati S/o Shri Dhoor Singh Bhati, aged – 53 years, R/o 75 Gorow House, Air Force Area, Jodhpur (Hall:-

Chargeman, No. 185 Fd. Wksp. Coy (SU) C/o 56 APO).

......Applicant By Advocate : Applicant in person.

Versus

1. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, Raksha Bhawan, New Delhi.

2. The Directorate General of EME (EME Civ.), Master General of the Ord. Branch, Integrated HQ of MoD (Army), Army Headquarter, DHQ PO New Delhi-11.

3. Dakshir Kaman Mukhyalaya, HQ Southern Command Pune-

411001.

4. The Headquarter Base Wksp, GP EME, Meerut Cantt, Meerut.

5. The Officer Commanding, HQ 185 Fd Wksp Coy (SU), C/o

7012 EME Bn. C/o 56 APO.

6. Shri Shiv Kumar, P. No. 4323 Uphol, presently posted as Froeman at No. 509 Army Base Wksp C/o 56 APO.

......Respondents By Advocate : Mr Babu Lal Bishnoi (R-1 to R-5).

Digitaly signed by SUDESH SHAKHI SUDESHD T R N I : B C U = N IN A , L O , O =C U E =J N O T D R H A P L U A R D M BE IN N IS C T H R , A P T h I o V n E e =

a27c6e3b70871625348f2a3c0c55c745e5a539aa4

870db2699074ca1c35d078c, PostalCode= 342006, S=Rajasthan, SERIALNUMBER=

F709B6DE94E2153CCFD55F34387F3BB788E0F ORDER Per : Hon’ble Mr Justice Rameshwar Vyas Being aggrieved by not finding place in the select panel for the panel year 2012-13 & 2013-14 as also in the promotion cum posting order to the post of Foreman, the applicant working on the post of Chargeman-I filed this OA assailing the selected panel as also promotion cum posting order of respondent No. 6 (Annex. A/1 to Annex. A/5.)

2. The facts necessary to adjudicate this OA are as under:-

2.1 The applicant was appointed as Vehicle Mechanic (Civil) through direct selection process on 24.03.1981. Thereafter, he was promoted in the higher rank of Highly Skilled Mechanic Grade-II (HS-II) on 10.05.1989 & HS-I on 10.05.1992. He was further promoted to the post of Chargeman-II vide order dated 25.12.2004 w.e.f. 07.08.2004 and Chargeman-I w.e.f.

01.04.2008 in general category.

2.2 The applicant did not find place in the select panel drawn by DPC for the panel year 2012-13 and panel year 2013-2014 for promotion to the post of Foreman from the Chargemen-I (Part II Cadre) whereas the private respondent No. 6 Mr Shiv Kumar from SC category got promotion from the post of Chargemen-I to the post of Foreman which is a Group B Gazetted non-industrial post.

2.3 Aggrieved with the above, the applicant has assailed the Select Panel dated 11.06.2012 (Annex. A/1), promotion cum posting order dated 13.06.2012 (Annex. A/2) for the post of Digitaly signed by SUDESH SHAKHI SUDESHD T R N I : B C U = N IN A , L O , O =C U E =J N O T D R H A P L U A R D M BE IN N IS C T H R , A P T h I o V n E e =

a27c6e3b70871625348f2a3c0c55c745e5a539aa4

870db2699074ca1c35d078c, PostalCode= 342006, S=Rajasthan, SERIALNUMBER=

F709B6DE94E2153CCFD55F34387F3BB788E0F Forman, promotion cum posting order of private respondent No. 6 dated 20.03.2013 (Annex. A/3), Select Panel drawn by the DPC for the panel year 2013-14 dated May 2013 (Annex. A/4), as also circular dated 03.05.2012 (Annex. A/13) whereby ratio of authorization of Tech Supervisor in Part-I cadre and Part-II cadre was decided in Corps of EME, on the following grounds :

(a) The category of Part-I cadre and Part-II cadre of Chargemen forms the same class, have same pay scale and their next promotion post is Foreman which is a supervisory gazetted post and forms one class but the respondents have prepared different seniority roll for Part I cadre and part II cadre of Chargemen. In Part I cadre, ratio of 1:8 over the strength of technician is maintained whereas in Part II cadre (to which applicant belongs), ratio of 1:14 over the strength of technician is maintained. Meaning thereby, out of 8 technicians of Part I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top