SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13755

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Ms. Urmita Datta (Sen), J, Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, A
Sumana Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Secretary to the Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue – Respondent
O.A. 350/00164/2015



Advocates:
For the Applicants: Mr. S.K. Datta
For the Respondents: Ms. A. Rajyashree
Mr. A.K. Manna

The promotion of employees must align with updated recruitment rules following cadre restructuring, protecting their interests in a fair promotion process.

Headnote:(A) Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Cadre restructuring - Promotion dispute - Applicants were promoted as Deputy Office Superintendents contrary to restructured guidelines which merged posts - Court ruled that promotion must adhere to new designations and pay scales post-restructuring. (Paras 12-13)

(B) Promotions - Validity - Promotions granted against non-existent posts post-merger of positions were set aside - Promotion from merged position of Executive Assistant with Grade Pay Rs. 4200 to Inspector with Grade Pay Rs. 4600 directed. (Paras 11-14)

Facts of the case:
Applicants, previously holding the position of Senior Tax Assistants, contested promotions given as Deputy Office Superintendents after the restructuring indicated their positions had been merged. They sought recognition as Executive Assistants to secure promotions accordingly.

Findings of Court:
Applicants to be considered for promotions in conjunction with new cadet restructuring, granting them deserved pay grades and posts absent from previous practices.

Issues: Pertained to legality of promotions granted contrary to established restructuring directives.

Ratio Decidendi: Court emphasized adherence to current recruitment and promotion guidelines following cadre restructuring to ensure fairness in elevation to higher posts post-application.

Result: Original Application disposed of in favour of the applicants with no costs awarded.

Table of Content
1. promotion disputes among customs department personnel due to restructuring. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. clarification sought regarding promotional regulations and restructuring impacts. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's contemplation on restructuring adherence and legislative implementation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
4. reinforcement of adherence to current recruitment protocols per restructuring. (Para 12)
5. final directive to rectify promotions based on outdated rules. (Para 13 , 14)

ORDER

Per Ms. Urmita Dutta (Sen), Judicial Member:

The instant Original Application has been filed by the applicants under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 praying for the following reliefs:-

“a. An order granting leave to the applicants under Rule 4(5)(a) of the Central Administrative Tribunals (Procedure) Rules, 1987 to move this application jointly.

b. An order quashing and/or setting aside the impugned communication dated 2.1.2015.

c. An order directing the respondents particularly the Respondent No.2 to consider the case of the applicants and issue necessary directions/instructions for redressing the grievance of the applicants.

d. An order directing the respondents to treat the applicants and all STA/DOS as Executive Assistants in terms of Circular dated 18.12.2013 and to grant them promotion to the grade of Inspector (Examiner) by holding Review DPC in place and instead of the promotion granted to the applicants as DOS.

e. An order directing the respondents to produce/cause production of all relevant records.

f. Any other order or further order/orders as to this Hon'ble Tribunal may seem fit and proper.”

2. The applicants joined the Customs Department as Lower Division Clerk on 18.09.1995, 23.02.1994, 14.06.1991 and 26.07.1995 respectively. Subsequently, they got promoted as Upper Division Clerk on 16.01.2002, 19.03.2001, 24.07.2001 and 31.12.2002 respectively and further as Tax Assistant on 05.05.2003, 05.05.2003, 05.05.2003 and 13.06.2003 respectively and Senior Tax Assistant on 01.04.2010, 01.04.2009, 01.04.2009 and 01.01.2011 respectively. After their promotion as Senior Tax Assistant, a letter/Circular dated 18.12.2013 was issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs addressed to the Director General, Directorate General of Human Resource Development, Customs & Central Excise, New Delhi regarding Restructuring & Reorganization of Field Formations under Central Board of Excise & Customs and in terms of the said letter the post of Deputy Office Superintendents and Senior Tax Assistants were merged and redesignated as Executive Assistant in the Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/- in PB-2 and their next promotional posts being either Administrative Officer or Inspector Cadre which includes Preventive Officer & Examiner.

The applicants state that prior to restructuring the of cadre the promotional channel from Senior Tax Assistant was either Deputy Office Superintendent or Inspector Cadre but due to the restructuring /organization there was no scope for promotion of Senior Tax Assistants to the post of Deputy Office Superintendent but without following the said instructions and without following the Para 6 of the aforesaid CBEC letter/circular dated 18.12.2013, the applicants were granted promotion as Deputy Office Superintendent on 02.05.2014, 09.05.2014, 09.05.2014 and 09.05.2014 respectively and such promotions were granted following the old Recruitment Rules, which were prevalent long prior to restructuring /reorganization of cadre and as a result of which the applicants were promoted as Deputy Office Superintendent in the same Grade Pay in PB-2 only with an incremental benefit of 3% whereas their juniors in the post of Senior Tax Assistants have been promoted as Inspector (Examiner) in PB-2 with Grade Pay of Rs. 4600/- due to availability of additional vacancies out of the aforesaid restructuring/reorganization of cadre in the post of Inspector (Examiner), although the fact remains that in view of cadre restructuring/reorganization

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top