Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mr. R.N. Singh, J, Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, A
SHRI NARDEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disciplinary charge background. (Para 2) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on inquiry violations. (Para 4) |
| 3. respondents' defense against claims. (Para 5) |
| 4. judicial review standards in disciplinary cases. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final order and dismissal of oa. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER
Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):
By filing the present OA under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985, the applicant is seeking the following reliefs:-
“8.1 That this Hon'ble Tribunal may be graciously pleased to allow the Application and· quash the impugned orders A-1, A-2 & A-3 and direct the Respondents to reinstate the Applicant and to give all consequential benefit including back wages and seniority.
8.2 To pass any other further orders.
8.3 To grant cost of the proceedings to the applicant.”
FACTS IN BRIEF
2. The applicant was initially appointed as a Ticket Collector on 21.01.1988 under the Sports Quota and was subsequently promoted to the post of Head Travelling Ticket Examiner (in short 'HTTE') in November 2003. While working in that capacity, a major penalty charge-sheet dated 17.01.2011 (Annexure A/4) was issued to him, alleging articles of ch
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
