Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MR. AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J, MRS. MALLIKA ARYA, A
Ghanshyam Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for voluntary retirement needs formal compliance. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. no assumption of retirement without consent from authority. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 3. voluntary retirement processes are not subjective to employee's whims. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
ORDER
By Mallika Arya, Member (A).
The applicant is challenging the chargesheet dated 03.05.2017 and is further seeking direction to the respondents to declare the applicant voluntarily retired w.e.f.07.01.2015 under Rule 48-A of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.
2. The applicant has made the following submissions in his Original Application:
2.1 The applicant was initially appointed as Inspector in Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax Department with effect from 17.05.1993.
2.2 The applicant claims to have made an application for voluntary retirement on 07.10.2014. However, the same was not considered by the respondents in the prescribed time frame.. Earlier, the applicant vide his application dated 31.01.2014 (Annexure A-2) had also sought for voluntary retirement from the Government service. However, on 28.04.2014 (Annexure A-3), the Respondent No. 5, refused the voluntary retirement application made by the Applicant with
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
