CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
MR. AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J, MRS. MALLIKA ARYA, AM
C. H. Shrinivas, Ramayan Sahu, Dinesh Vaishnav, Ram Prasad Sahu, Manharan Lal Sahu, Dwarika Prasad Yadav, Kamal Kumar Yadav, Prahlad Mahananda – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER
By Mallika Arya, AM.-
This Original Application has been filed by the applicants against the order dated 11.05.2023 (Annexure A/1) whereby the claim of the applicants for absorption/regularization in services has been rejected.
2. Briefly stating, the facts of the case are that the applicants are working in the respondent department on daily wages in the Parcel Office since 2002. They applied to the competent authority for their regularization in view of the regularization given to Parcel Porters working in the Nagpur Division in line with the order dated 15.07.2010 (Annexure A/2) passed by the CGIT cum Labour Court, Nagpur (Annexure A/2). The respondents vide order dated 16.11.2016 turned down the claim of the applicants for regularization/absorption. The applicants filed Original Application No. 928/2017 before the Tribunal and the same was disposed vide order dated 09.02.2023, wherein the following directions were given:
“9. However, it also cannot be ignored that if the applicants are working as Parcel Porters since 2002, they should not be deprived of their legitimate claim for regularisation absorption especially when the other zone of the same Railways has extended such be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.