SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13872

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, JM, MRS. MALLIKA ARYA, AM
Rajesh Kumar Patel – Appellant
Versus
Shobna Band Upadhyay – Respondent
Contempt Petition No.43/2025 | OA 849/2012



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Shri Manoj Sharma, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Shrunkhla Darekar
For the Respondents: Shri D.S. Baghel

Compliance with tribunal orders assessed; non-willful disobedience in contempt cases is not actionable.

Headnote:(A) Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Non-compliance of Tribunal’s order - Allegation of contempt for failure to implement prior directions regarding promotions for Loco Pilot positions - The Tribunal found that the order had been complied with to the greatest extent possible. (Paras 10, 11, 12, 14)

(B) Administrative Law - The matter concerns interpretation of the Tribunal's prior orders and compliance therewith - The court held that issues of compliance do not equate to a decision on the correctness of orders, emphasized that non-compliance must be willful to constitute contempt. (Paras 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners alleged non-compliance of a Tribunal's order for promotion eligibility based on seniority cum suitability without passing mandatory training. Respondents argued compliance based on their interpretations.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that orders from April 2014 had been complied with; petitioners could raise grievances in further proceedings.

Issues: The main questions were related to the interpretation of compliance with the Tribunal's orders and whether contempt was established due to alleged failure to comply.

Ratio Decidendi: The Tribunal guarded the interpretation of its orders, affirming that potential disputes over compliance do not equate to contempt.

Result: Contempt petition closed and no contempt found.

Table of Content
1. challenging non-compliance with tribunal orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments on eligibility and promotion. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court observations on compliance and interpretation. (Para 8 , 9)
4. interpretation of compliance and contempt standards. (Para 10 , 12)
5. final ruling that contempt not established. (Para 14)

ORDER

By Akhil Kumar Srivastava, JM.-

This Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioners alleging non compliance of the order dated 30.04.2014 passed by this Tribunal in Original Application No.849/2012.

2. The petitioners have filed the Original Application challenging the action of the respondents of passing of MLD course, a mandatory qualification for promotion from Senior Assistant Loco Pilot/Assistant Loco Pilot to Loco Pilot (Shunting).

2.1 The Original Application filed by the petitioners was disposed of vide order dated 30.04.2014 in the light of the order passed in Original Application No.355 of 2009 dated 10.01.2013 with the stipulation that the petitioners will be governed by the decision of the Hon’ble High Court in Writ Petition No.5908/2013.

2.2 On 09.09.2024 (Annexure C-3), the Hon’ble High Court has dismissed the Writ Petition filed by the respondents and have affirmed the order passed by this Tribunal.

2.3 The petitioners submit that despite the judicial pronouncements and also various representations by the petitioners, the respondents have not complied with the order passed by this Tribunal. Hence, this Contempt Petition has been filed.

3. The respondents have responded to the notice of contempt by filing their reply on 16.06.2025 inter alia stating as under:

3.1 The provision of written examination for selection of Loco Pilot Goods II was discontinued vide RBE No.161/2009 dated 03.09.2009 and it is now being done on basis of seniority-cum-suitability. RBE No.161/2009). Accordingly, later on the petitioners coming in the zone of consideration for the test held on 08.04.2009 were also promoted on LPG-II (which was merged with LPG-I in 6th PC and designated as LPG) along with others on the different dates between 2009 to 2014.

3.2 In para 17 of the order dated 10.01.2013 passed in OA No.355 of 2009, this Tribunal has directed the respondents to conduct a review selection/written examination in which all the candidates, who are eligible to take part in pursuance of notification dt. 16.03.2009, while ignoring the first eligible condition in this notification which is regarding passing of MLD training, should be allowed to participate. Therefore, the administration has complied with the direction of this Tribunal and the panel which was formed on 23.06.2009 has been revised vide letter dated 10.01.2025 by including all the employees who were found suitable for the post of Loco Pilot Goods in the suitability tests held on different dates between 2009 to 2014 and are coming in the zone of consideration for the test held on 08.04.2009. The merit has been kept as per seniority of the employees (General seniority for unreserved 148 posts and thereafter SC/ST employees who have been placed on reserved vacancies) based on the latest seniority list which was available at that time i.e, issued on 01.03.2006 (LPS-I; LPS-II; SrALP) & 10.10.2007(ALP).

3.3 There are more than 256 employees available in the zone of consideration (Including LPS-I; LPS-II, SrALP & ALP) above the applicants as per seniority list dated 01.03.2006 & 10.10.2007. Suitability for promotion to LPG was further held in 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014 as and when vacancies arose. The petitioners of the OA No. 355/2009 were promoted to the post of LPG in suitability conducted in 2012 as per their seniority in UR block and vacancies available. However, the present petitioners could not be promoted to the post of LPG in 2012 because their seniority position was far below than the last promoted employee in UR block.

3.4 All the employees coming in the zone of consideration for the post of Loco Pilot Goods have been included as per seniority,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top