SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 13883

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J, SMT MALLIKA ARYA, AM
Shekhar Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur – Respondent
Original Application No.203/00617/2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: in person
For the Respondents: Shri Vaibhav Shukla, Shri K Rohan

A participant in a recruitment process cannot challenge the selection of another unless personally aggrieved by the outcome.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16 - Challenge to appointment of Junior Engineer on grounds of alleged lack of qualification - Applicant participated in the selection process but was not successful due to unqualification - Locus standi established barring applicant from disputing selection process - Requirements for eligibility to be evaluated in line with the notifications issued. (Paras 3-14)

(B) Recruitment - Judicial Review - Scope of judicial review in selection matters is limited; a candidate who partakes in the selection cannot challenge it after failure; only aggrieved parties maintain locus standi to appeal against the decision - The appointment of candidates rests with the discretion of the employer as per established practices. (Para 6)

Table of Content
1. facts of the case detailed. (Para 1 , 2)
2. applicant's arguments against the appointment. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's observations on participant's locus standi. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
4. court's reasoning dismissing the case. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
5. final dismissal of the application. (Para 14)

ORDER

By Mallika Arya, AM:

This Original Application has been filed by the applicant against appointment of Respondent no.2 to the post of Junior Engineer (AC&R) by the Competent Authority (Respondent no.1) at AIIMS Raipur consequent to the final result declared as per notification dated 12.11.2016 (Annexure A/4).

2. Briefly stating, the facts of the case are that the Respondent no.1 (AIIMS Raipur) published a notification on 25/01/2014, for filling up 4 posts of Junior Engineer (AC&R) through direct recruitment. Out of 4 posts, 3 posts were for General and 1 post was reserved for the OBC category. Candidates had to fill the form online. Essential qualifications mentioned for the post are as follows:

"3 Year Diploma in Mechanical Engineering plus a specialized course in Refrigeration and Air conditioning from a recognized Polytechnic/Institute" and Desirable Qualification as "Experience in Refrigeration and Air conditioning".

Respondent no.2 applied for the said post as he was having "Diploma in Mechanical Engineering” and "Refrigeration and Air Conditioning certificate” from Industrial Training Institute (I.T.I.), Bhiwani (Annexure A-2). Both the Applicant and Respondent no.2 appeared for the written exam on 18/06/2016. On the basis of written exam, Respondent no.1 published a notice for document verification. Both the Applicant and Respondent no.2 appeared for the document verification (Annexure A-3). The final result for the aforesaid post was declared on 12/11/2016 wherein Mr. Anoop Singh (Respondent no.2) was declared successful. Applicant’s candidature got rejected for unknown reasons. A copy of Final Result is marked as Annexure A-4. The Applicant filed a Writ Petition no. WP(S) / 141/2017 in the High Court of Chhattisgarh on 06/01/2017 regarding his disqualification and illegal selection of Respondent no.2. The said W.P. was disposed with a liberty to Applicant to file an O.A. before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jabalpur Bench. The Respondent no. 2 obtained National Trade Certificate from Industrial Training Institute Bhiwani in Trade of "Mechanic Refrigeration and Air Conditioning".

The Essential qualification prescribed for the said post in Recruitment Notification was a Specialized course in "Refrigeration and Air Conditioning" from recognized Polytechnic/Institute. Hence, Respondent no.2 did not have the requisite qualification for the post as mentioned in the Recruitment Notification. A copy of Trade Certificate of Respondent No. 2 from Industrial Training Institute, Bhiwani is enclosed as Annexure A-9. The course undertaken by the Respondent No. 2 (Mechanic Refrigeration and Air Conditioning) is entirely differently from the Specialized course "Refrigeration and Air Conditioning" from a recognized polytechnic/Institute.

Only Polytechnic Institutes provide Engineering Diploma/Post Diploma in Refrigeration and Air Conditioning. AICTE/UGC affiliated Institutes do not offer any course in "Mechanic Refrigeration and Air Conditioning". It is actually given by National Council of Vocational Training (NCVT) through Industrial Training Institutes. Hence the specialized course in "Refrigeration and Air Conditioning" as mentioned in advertisement is entirely different from "Mechanic Refrigeration and Air Conditioning". NCVT is an entirely different body from AICTE & UGC and it is not a statutory body. Respondent no.2 did I.T.I in year 2006 and obtained his Diploma in year 2009. Therefore the Respondent no. 2 has done specialized course earlier to acquiring the Diploma. Hence, Respondent no.1 has given undue favour to Respondent no.2 and issued an appointment letter to him illegally which merits to be set-aside. Th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top