Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J, SMT MALLIKA ARYA, AM
Shekhar Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Director, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Raipur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case detailed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's arguments against the appointment. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on participant's locus standi. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's reasoning dismissing the case. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final dismissal of the application. (Para 14) |
ORDER
By Mallika Arya, AM:
This Original Application has been filed by the applicant against appointment of Respondent no.2 to the post of Junior Engineer (AC&R) by the Competent Authority (Respondent no.1) at AIIMS Raipur consequent to the final result declared as per notification dated 12.11.2016 (Annexure A/4).
2. Briefly stating, the facts of the case are that the Respondent no.1 (AIIMS Raipur) published a notification on 25/01/2014, for filling up 4 posts of Junior Engineer (AC&R) through direct recruitment. Out of 4 posts, 3 posts were for General and 1 post was reserved for the OBC category. Candidates had to fill the form online. Essential qualifications mentioned for the post are as follows:
"3 Year Diploma in Mechanical Engineering plus a specialized course in Refrigeration and Air conditioning from a recognized Polytechnic/Institute" and Desirable Qualification as "
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
