Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Mrs. Harvinder Kaur Oberoi, J, Dr. Sumeet Jerath, A
Mr. Rakesh Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India Through its Secretary (Revenue) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of denial for promotion based on sealed cover. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against the validity of sealed cover based on eligibility and regulations. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. the judicial reasoning emphasizing that legal precedent mandates transparent promotion processes. (Para 4) |
| 4. court observations criticizing the adherence to the proper protocols for vigilance clearance. (Para 7) |
| 5. final ruling to lift sealed cover status and promote applicant. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
Hon'ble Dr. Sumeet Jerath, Member (A):
The instant OA has been filed by the applicant under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following reliefs:-
"A. The Applicant humbly prays to this Hon'ble Tribunal to direct the Respondents to produce the 'sealed cover' before this Hon'ble Tribunal so that this Hon'ble Tribunal may view the contents of the "sealed cover and thereafter direct the Respondents to convene a DPC for grant of regular posts to the Applicant within a short-specified timeframe, in view of the fact that the Applicant is retiring from government service w.e.f. 30.11.2025.
B. The Applicant humbly prays to this Hon'ble Tribunal to direct the Respondents
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
