Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sunil Thomas, J, V. Rama Mathew, A
Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited – Appellant
Versus
V.K. Devarajan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. dispute over pension and loan recoveries. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. procedural challenges and disciplinary actions. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. legal basis for initiating disciplinary proceedings. (Para 19 , 20 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. constitutional implications of caste status and employment. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 6. legal consequences of obtaining employment through false certificates. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 7. entitlement to retirement benefits based on service tenure. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 8. judgment effects on terminal benefits and employment claims. (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. final judgment and order on the case. (Para 47 , 48) |
ORDER
Per: Justice Sunil Thomas, Judicial Member –
Review Application No. 180/00001/2022 and Contempt Petition No. 180/00014/2021 in Original Application No. 180/00186/2020 –
The applicant retired from BSNL under the VRS Scheme 2019, with effect from 31.1.2020. During his service, he had availed huge loans from KSFE, Union Bank and Cooperative Banks, to the tune of Rs. 27 lakhs. Consequent to his voluntary retirement, BSNL initiated s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
