Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J, Anjani Nandan Sharan, ACJ
Brijesh Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through the Comptroller and Auditor General of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the applicant's promotion application and subsequent rejection. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by the applicant and respondents concerning the promotion process. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. legal evaluations and rationalization for the dismissal of the application. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. final dismissal verdict of the application. (Para 22) |
ORDER
Delivered by Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial)
Heard Shri J. Nagar, learned Sr. Advocate assisted by Ms. Amita Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Pankaj Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Instant Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief(s):-
“i. The Hon’ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash the impugned letters dated 22.09.2003 (Annexure A-1), 01.07.2004 (Annexure A-2) and 04.08.2005 (Annexure A-3) respectively and allow all consequential benefits to the applicant, including seniority.
ii. The Hon’ble Tribunal may further be pleased to direct the respondents to promote the applicant on the post of Senior Private Secretar
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
