Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J, Anjani Nandan Sharan, ACJ
Subhash Chandra Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the applicant's employment and the allegations against him. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the inquiry and results. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on legal principles regarding procedural fairness and proportionality in disciplinary actions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
ORDER
Delivered by Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial)
Heard Shri S.K. Singh Vashisth, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Krishna Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the respondents
2. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act , 1985 seeking the following main relief(s):-
i. The Hon'ble Tribunal may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned charge sheet dated 15.3.2011 issued by the Senior Personnel Officer, North Eastern Railway, Varanasi / the Respondent no. 3/5 (Annexure A-1) , enquiry report communicated with show cause notice by Disciplinary Authority vide his letter dated 29.9.2011 (Annexure A-2), order of penalty / NIP of reduction in the same time scale passed vide Order dated 27.12.2011 passed by Sr. D.P.O./ N.E. Railw
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
