Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial)
Surendra Kumar Bajpai – Appellant
Versus
Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the applicant's employment and transfer history. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments from both parties regarding the entitlement to salary. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. discussion on the principle of 'no work no pay' and its applicability. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. the court's ruling on the improper denial of salary. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 5. concluding remarks and orders regarding the final verdict. (Para 16 , 17) |
ORDER
Heard Shri Sunil, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The applicant has filed the present Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following main relief(s):-
“i. This Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 17.09.2018 (as contained in Annexure No.-1 to this O.A.) passed by respondent no.2, in the interest of justice.
(ii) This Hon'ble Tribunal may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to regularise the period w.e.f. 22.03.2016 to 22.08.2016 and release the salary for the aforesaid period to the applicant with 18% interest, in the interest of justice.”
3. The brief facts of the case, as stated in the Original Application, are that the applican
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
