Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, J, Anjani Nandan Sharan, ACJ
Ramesh Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disciplinary proceedings initiated with lack of evidence and due process. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. legal representation and procedural fairness in disciplinary actions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. judicial observations highlighting procedural inadequacies and reliance on undisclosed evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 13) |
| 4. substantive flaws in the inquiry process and need for adherence to procedural law. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. outcome of the case supporting reinstatement due to inherent process violations. (Para 23 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
ORDER
By Justice Rajiv Joshi, Member (Judicial)
Heard Anil Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Chakrapani Vatsyayan, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Instant Original Application has been filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief(s):-
“i. To issue a writ orders or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 31.03.2022, 05.11.2021 passed by the disciplinary authority and enhanced punishment order dated 25.05.2022 passed by the appellate authority (Annexure No. A-1 to this Original Application in compilation No.I)
ii
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
