Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Urmita Datta (Sen), Judicial Member, Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member
SAFIUL ALAM – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, service through Secretary, Ministry of Communications (Department of Posts), Government of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review of suspension must adhere to specified rules and timelines. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. allegations of misappropriation necessitate immediate administrative action. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. invalid review processes render extended suspensions unlawful. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. court directs salary payment for improperly extended suspension periods. (Para 10) |
ORDER
Per Hon’ble Mr. Suchitto Kumar Das, Administrative Member :
1. The applicant has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act , 1985, praying for the following relief(s):
“(a) An order be passed quashing and/or setting aside the order of suspension dated 17.07.2020 issued by the Superintendent of Post Offices vide a memo no. F/Suri H.O./NREGA/Fraud/Misc.
(b) An order be passed quashing and/or setting aside the speaking and/or reasoned order dated 20.02.2025, passed by the Director of Postal Services, Kolkata region vide memo no. PMG(KR)/Vig/Rev/Sus/14/S.Alam.
(c) An order be passed directing the respondent authorities concerned, to disburse balance salary of the petitioner for the period spent in suspension on and from 17.07.2020 to 03.03.2021.
(d) An order to quash and set aside th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
